Washington Post’s Columnist Misuses Historic Name

SMCCDI Note:  The term PERSIAN has been inserted, in the below article, by SMCCDI.

Mr. David Ignatius, who’s claimed to be a non partisan and well educated columnist, should better know that the lonely term of Gulf is meaningless coming to mention geographical entities. He should avoid to use the shameless path of mercantilist British and French writers who are blinded by the money channel of some Arab countries of the Persian Gulf region. He should better follow the path of most of his respected American colleagues, who are keeping their sens of integrity, when reporting facts and when naming this well known and UN recognized geographical entity.

It’s only then, that he will be more credible.

See here.

Media Coddle Rafsanjani

MSM is at it again; this time, as PR agents for another notorious mass murderer. Him who masterminded the killing of Iranian dissidents in Europe, as well as dozens of hundreds of public executions, random killings of students, and so on.

SMCCDI Note: Rafsanjani has masterminded the systematic crackdown on any dissent and the extermination of Iranian opponents.

His comments are not be taken as a sign of sudden humanism, but more of the increasing fear of what can happen to his backwarded regime, himself and his family involved in looting Iran and Iranians.

Putin Heads to Iran, Seeking Tighter Grip on Europe’s Energy (SEE SMCCDI Note…)

SMCCDI Note: Iranians oppose any change or agreement that would affect the Caspian Sea’s division and borders, other than those stipulated in treaty and convention ratified between 1921 and 1975 between the former Soviet Union and the then’s Iran’s Imperial regime.

Such agreements have shared the Caspian Sea on a 50/50 basis between Iran and the then Soviet Union.

Any new distribution should ONLY affect the 50% share which was allocated to the former Soviet Union and its then components which have become, today, independent. This principle should be as simple to understand, than as any contract which would have been made between, a recently, divorced couple and any third party during their common life.

The third party should not pay for the consequences of divorce happened between the couple.

Any deal on any change made between any component of the Islamic regime and any of the Caspian Sea’s bordering countries is NULL and VOID.

See more here